夫妻住合租房生娃，被要求“3个工作日搬离”，平台：合同规定入住不超2人，年龄18~40岁！最新回应

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a recent incident involving a couple in Guangzhou who were asked to vacate their rented room due to a violation of the rental agreement after the birth of their child, highlighting the tension between contractual obligations and human considerations in rental agreements [2][4][11]. Summary by Sections Incident Overview - A couple rented a room in Guangzhou through a platform and faced eviction after the birth of their child, as the landlord claimed they violated the rental agreement by exceeding the allowed number of occupants [5][7]. - The rental contract specified a maximum of two occupants per room and prohibited minors, which the couple violated by having a child [8][12]. Platform's Response - The rental platform stated that they had provided multiple solutions to the couple, including a no-fault termination of the lease, but the couple refused to accept these options [2][9]. - The platform emphasized the need to balance the living experience of the couple with that of other tenants, leading to the decision to terminate the lease after failed negotiations [2][11]. Legal and Social Context - The rental agreement's restrictions are rooted in local regulations aimed at preventing overcrowding and ensuring safety, with specific guidelines on minimum living space per person [12][14]. - The article raises questions about the balance between contractual obligations and the humane treatment of tenants, especially in cases involving childbirth and family dynamics [11][15]. Broader Implications - The incident reflects broader issues in the rental market, including discrimination against certain demographics such as the elderly and families with children, which can exacerbate housing challenges [14][16]. - Suggestions for policy improvements include creating more inclusive rental agreements and developing public housing initiatives to support families and vulnerable populations [15][16].