13个精算师·2025-09-16 15:54Core Insights - The property insurance industry has seen a significant increase in net profits, surpassing 50 billion for the first time, marking a historical high for the same period [10][11][12] - Both investment income and underwriting profits have risen, contributing to the overall profitability of the sector [8][14] - Among the top three insurers, PICC leads in profitability, while Ping An shows the fastest premium growth and Taiping has reduced its cost ratio for two consecutive years [35][36][37] Group 1: Industry Performance - In the first half of 2025, 86 property insurance companies reported a total net profit of 52.5 billion, an increase of approximately 13 billion year-on-year, representing a growth rate of 33% [11][12][20] - The average investment return for 87 property insurance companies was 1.83%, up from 1.24% the previous year, indicating a rise of about 0.59 percentage points [14][15] - 67% of the companies saw a decrease in their comprehensive cost ratio, with 56 out of 84 companies reporting improvements [12][15] Group 2: Leading Companies - PICC achieved a net profit of 243.76 billion, a year-on-year increase of 59 billion, solidifying its position as the industry leader [29][30] - Ping An's premium growth rate is the highest among the top three insurers, with significant improvements in both auto and non-auto insurance segments [36][39] - Taiping's auto insurance cost ratio has decreased for two consecutive years, reaching 95.3% in the first half of 2025 [36][39] Group 3: Mid-Sized Insurers - Six insurers with a scale of 300 billion or more reported a comprehensive cost ratio below 100%, indicating underwriting profitability [40][41] - These companies, including Guoshou Property and Dadi Property, have seen improvements in both premium scale and underwriting profitability [40][41] Group 4: Loss-Making Companies - Eight property insurance companies reported losses, with Qianhai United leading the loss list at 0.51 billion, continuing a trend of consecutive losses [43][47] - The high comprehensive cost ratio of these companies, often exceeding 110%, has been a significant factor in their financial struggles [50][51]