5555被拒稿，AC接收但PC强拒，NeurIPS揭榜引争议

Core Insights - NeurIPS 2025 received a total of 21,575 valid paper submissions, with 5,290 accepted, resulting in an acceptance rate of 24.52%, slightly below 25% [1] - Among the accepted papers, 4,525 are poster papers, 688 are spotlight papers, and 77 are oral papers [2] - Some accepted papers have already made significant impacts in the AI community, such as being utilized in Qwen-next [3] - The conference has seen submissions from very young scholars, including first-year undergraduate students [7] Submission and Acceptance Details - The acceptance rate for NeurIPS 2025 is indicative of a competitive selection process, as high-scoring papers can still be rejected to maintain this rate [1][22] - A notable case includes a paper with an average score of 4.75 being rejected, highlighting the stringent review process [22] - There are reports of papers being rejected due to physical resource limitations, which has raised concerns about the rationale behind such decisions [32] Reviewer Feedback and Rebuttal Process - The rebuttal process has been criticized for leading to higher scores for some papers, which in turn affects the acceptance rates of subsequent submissions [34] - Instances of papers receiving unanimous positive reviews yet still being rejected have been reported, questioning the decision-making process of the program chairs [35][39] Industry Implications - The increasing number of submissions to NeurIPS reflects the growing interest and competition in the AI research field, suggesting a need for alternative publication channels to accommodate valuable work that may not meet the main conference standards [41] - The challenges faced by researchers in the submission process may impact the overall innovation and dissemination of AI research, as high-quality work risks being overlooked [41]