Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant loan fraud case involving Huaneng Trust, a state-owned trust company, and its partners, which has resulted in over 1.7 billion yuan in unrecoverable trust funds. The case highlights severe regulatory and compliance failures within the financial industry, particularly in risk management and internal controls [4][5][17]. Summary by Sections Background of the Case - The fraud case, known as the "Credit Insurance Loan" scheme, began in June 2019 when Huaneng Trust partnered with Huishang Bank and a local insurance company to create a loan product designed to share risks among multiple parties [7]. - The scheme was initially presented as a financial innovation aimed at mutual benefits, but it devolved into a fraudulent operation involving collusion among various parties [5][6]. Mechanism of the Fraud - The fraud was orchestrated by Chi Jinlong, the actual controller of Shenzhen Xingrui Information Technology Co., who manipulated the loan process by using fake identities to secure loans [11]. - Key players, including bank officials and insurance executives, neglected their due diligence responsibilities, allowing fraudulent loans to be approved without proper verification [9][10]. Scale of the Fraud - The fraud involved multiple layers, with Chi Jinlong's operations leading to the misappropriation of 2.5 million yuan in the first loan and a total of 12.7 billion yuan in loans being fraudulently obtained by the team of former Century Huatong director Shao Heng [12][11]. - By the time the fraud was uncovered, only 8.3 billion yuan of the principal had been repaid, resulting in a loss of 4.2 billion yuan to financial institutions [12]. Regulatory and Compliance Failures - The case underscores significant deficiencies in the risk management practices of Huishang Bank, which faced multiple regulatory penalties for various compliance failures between 2021 and 2025, totaling over 22.79 million yuan [17][18]. - The article also highlights systemic issues within the bank's governance, including corruption among senior executives, which has led to a series of legal actions against them [19]. Judicial Outcomes - As of July 2025, Chi Jinlong faced criminal charges for loan fraud and bribery, while Shao Heng received a non-prosecution decision, raising concerns about the fairness of the judicial process [14][12]. - The case remains ongoing, with implications for the broader financial industry regarding the need for improved regulatory oversight and internal controls [5][17].