一只“臭虾王”炸出资本“天团”：50万学生午餐，成了谁的提款机？

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the controversy surrounding Shanghai Green捷, a major player in the school meal supply market, following a food safety incident involving spoiled shrimp. This incident has sparked public outrage and raised concerns about the quality and safety of school meals, revealing deeper issues related to capital-driven profit motives in the food supply chain [3][7][33]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A parent discovered spoiled shrimp in their child's school lunch, leading to a public outcry and a petition for better meal quality from suppliers like 西贝 [3]. - The incident reflects long-standing grievances from parents regarding the quality of school lunches, which are often perceived as unhealthy and made from low-quality ingredients [3][9]. - Shanghai Green捷, which supplies around 500,000 meals daily, has faced scrutiny for its food safety practices and the quality of its meals, which are often criticized as unappetizing and unhealthy [9][10]. Group 2: Financial and Operational Insights - Shanghai Green捷 has been operating as a "hidden champion" in the school meal market since its establishment in 2014, serving a significant portion of Shanghai's schools [9]. - The company has a meal cost of 6-8 yuan while charging 18 yuan per meal, raising questions about profit margins and the quality of ingredients used [7][31]. - The financial performance of Shanghai Green捷 has been strong, with revenues reaching 5.6 billion yuan in 2017 and a net profit margin of 15.7%, significantly higher than many competitors [26][27]. Group 3: Capital and Ownership Structure - The ownership structure of Shanghai Green捷 involves complex offshore arrangements, with significant investments from major players like the Liu Yonghao family and Temasek [21][22]. - The company has been linked to various capital entities, indicating a network of financial interests that may prioritize profit over food safety [15][21]. - The involvement of family-linked businesses in both supply and inspection raises concerns about conflicts of interest and accountability in food safety practices [19][23]. Group 4: Regulatory and Safety Concerns - Following the food safety incident, Shanghai Green捷 faced investigations for allegedly concealing information about food safety issues [14][33]. - The company's response to the incident was criticized for being inadequate, lacking a comprehensive plan for accountability and improvement [14][33]. - The incident has highlighted the broader issue of how capital interests can compromise food safety and quality in essential services like school meals [33].