张亚中向前一步，其他人原地踏步

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the urgency of Taiwan's political situation, emphasizing the need for the Kuomintang (KMT) to adopt a clear stance on the "1992 Consensus" and pursue cross-strait unification to avoid potential crises [2][11]. Group 1: Perspectives on the "1992 Consensus" - Zhang Yachung argues that the KMT should clearly recognize the "1992 Consensus" as acknowledging one China and pursuing unification, which would align with mainland China's policies [2][11]. - Luo Zhixiang describes the "1992 Consensus" as a creative ambiguity that allows for mutual non-recognition of sovereignty while facilitating dialogue and agreements during the KMT's governance [3]. - Gao Longbin emphasizes the importance of maintaining the status quo and using dialogue instead of confrontation, suggesting that the ambiguity of the "1992 Consensus" is crucial for future interactions [3]. Group 2: Responses and Critiques - Zhang Yachung critiques other KMT candidates for avoiding the question of unification and misinterpreting the "1992 Consensus," suggesting that their positions are inadequate for addressing current challenges [4][10]. - The article notes that the responses from Luo, Gao, and Zheng were coordinated, indicating a consensus among them to maintain a vague stance on cross-strait relations [8][9]. - Zhang Yachung expresses frustration over the KMT's inaction and the lack of urgency in addressing the risks facing Taiwan [12]. Group 3: Future Implications - The article suggests that if Lu Xiuyan, the current mayor of Taichung, runs for the 2028 election, the KMT's unified stance on the "1992 Consensus" will serve as a foundation for future cross-strait discussions [9]. - The KMT's leadership appears to be aligning their policies with Lu Xiuyan, potentially sidelining Zhang Yachung's more assertive approach [6][7].