Sora 2数手指翻车，奥特曼成第一批「受害者」，被AI玩成最惨打工人

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the performance and limitations of AI video generation models, particularly focusing on Sora 2 and its ability to accurately represent counting with fingers, highlighting the challenges and humorous outcomes of such tests [2][4][8]. Group 1: AI Model Performance - Sora 2 was tested with a prompt to count from 1 to 10 using fingers, but it failed to match the verbal count with the displayed fingers, showcasing a discrepancy in its output [2][3]. - Previous tests with another model, Veo3, also resulted in incorrect counting, indicating a consistent issue across different AI models when interpreting ambiguous prompts [4][8]. - A more specific prompt was suggested to improve accuracy, but even with this refinement, both Sora 2 and Veo3 still failed to perform correctly [6][8]. Group 2: Cultural Impact and Trends - The article notes that AI-generated videos featuring popular characters like Ultraman have become a trend, with humorous and bizarre scenarios being created, leading to a new form of entertainment [10][14]. - There is a growing trend of incorporating Pikachu into various movie titles, reflecting the playful and creative use of AI in media [14]. - OpenAI's Sora application has sparked discussions about copyright and the ethical implications of using well-known characters in AI-generated content, raising concerns among researchers [15][16]. Group 3: OpenAI's Position and Concerns - OpenAI's CEO, Sam Altman, expressed the need for funding to support AI research while balancing the development of consumer applications like Sora [20]. - Some OpenAI researchers have voiced concerns about the implications of releasing Sora, questioning whether it aligns with the organization's non-profit mission [18][19]. - The dual nature of technological advancement is highlighted, with a focus on the need for responsible development of AI applications to avoid past mistakes in the industry [21].