风波再起，OpenAI被指通过警方向AI监管倡导者施压，马斯克锐评其「建立在谎言之上」

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the controversy surrounding OpenAI's legal actions against Nathan Calvin, a participant advocating for AI regulation, highlighting the implications of the recently passed SB 53 bill in California and OpenAI's response to criticism regarding transparency and governance [1][2][3]. Group 1: Legal Actions and Controversy - Nathan Calvin, a lawyer and member of the Encode organization, received a subpoena from OpenAI, which demanded private information related to California legislators and former OpenAI employees [2][3]. - The subpoena is linked to the SB 53 bill, which mandates large AI developers to disclose their safety protocols and update them regularly, effective from September 30 [3][4]. - OpenAI's actions are perceived as an attempt to intimidate critics and investigate potential funding from Elon Musk, who has been vocal against the company [4][5]. Group 2: Reactions and Implications - Calvin expressed his dissatisfaction with OpenAI's tactics, suggesting they are using legal means to suppress dissent and maintain control over the narrative surrounding AI governance [4][5]. - Other organizations, such as the Midas Project, have reported similar experiences with OpenAI, indicating a broader pattern of legal scrutiny against those advocating for transparency [5]. - OpenAI's Chief Strategy Officer defended the company's actions as necessary to protect its interests amid ongoing litigation with Musk, questioning the motives behind Encode's support for Musk [7][8].