科技部通报批评3家科研单位，限期一年整改

Core Insights - The evaluation results indicate an increased emphasis on open sharing among participating units compared to 2024, with improved management and application levels of shared resources [2][5]. Group 1: Evaluation Overview - A total of 26 departments and 344 units participated in the evaluation, involving 53,000 scientific instruments valued over 500,000 yuan and 71 major scientific research infrastructures [2][5]. - The average effective working hours for the evaluated scientific instruments was 1,599 hours per year, with an average of 273 hours of external service [5]. Group 2: Evaluation Results - 50 units, including the Institute of Biophysics of the Chinese Academy of Sciences, received an "Excellent" rating for their management systems and high operational efficiency [6][7]. - 100 units, such as the Subtropical Agricultural Ecology Research Institute, were rated "Good" for having relatively sound management systems and good sharing outcomes [7]. - 191 units, including the Shanghai Institute of Organic Chemistry, met the basic requirements for open sharing and received a "Qualified" rating [7]. - 3 units, including the Fifth Research Institute of the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology, were rated "Poor" due to inadequate responsibility for open sharing and low usage rates of common instruments [7]. Group 3: Follow-up Actions - Units rated "Excellent" and "Good" will be recognized and rewarded with supplementary funding, while those rated "Poor" will face criticism and be required to rectify issues within a year [3][7].