Workflow
商务部回应!
券商中国·2025-10-14 09:11

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses China's strong opposition to the U.S. unilateral measures against its maritime, logistics, and shipbuilding industries, which are seen as protectionist and discriminatory actions that violate WTO rules and harm China's industrial interests [2][3]. Group 1: U.S. Measures and China's Response - The U.S. has implemented port fees and restrictions on China's maritime and shipbuilding sectors based on the findings of a Section 301 investigation, which China views as a violation of the China-U.S. Maritime Agreement and WTO rules [2]. - China has expressed strong dissatisfaction and opposition to these measures, stating they unfairly advantage U.S. shipping and shipbuilding companies and harm China's related industries [2]. - In retaliation, China announced on October 10 that it would impose special port fees on vessels with U.S. elements, including those flagged, built, or owned by U.S. companies [2]. Group 2: Impact on Global Trade and U.S. Economy - The U.S. measures are expected to disrupt global supply chains, significantly increase international trade costs, and contribute to rising inflation in the U.S., ultimately harming the competitiveness of U.S. ports and employment [2]. - There are voices within the U.S. industry opposing these measures, indicating that such actions are detrimental to both U.S. interests and the development of its shipbuilding sector [2]. Group 3: China's Legal and Regulatory Actions - In order to protect its industrial interests, China has placed certain companies that assisted the U.S. investigation on a countermeasure list and will investigate actions that threaten the safety and development of its maritime and shipbuilding industries [3]. - China emphasizes a commitment to conducting investigations and enforcement in an open, fair, and just manner, ensuring the rights of all stakeholders are protected [3]. - China maintains a clear stance on these issues, indicating readiness for both confrontation and dialogue, urging the U.S. to correct its actions and engage in equal dialogue to resolve mutual concerns [3].