这家新能源汽车从铜陵到成都的198天：车门还是没打开

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the ongoing safety concerns and controversies surrounding a specific automotive brand, particularly in the context of recent accidents and regulatory changes in the electric vehicle industry [5][12][14]. Group 1: Recent Accidents and Public Response - A recent accident involving the SU7 Ultra model resulted in a fire and fatalities, occurring just hours before a social media post promoting the vehicle [3][5]. - The brand has faced significant public backlash, with social media comments criticizing the vehicle's safety features, particularly the inability to open doors during emergencies [8][9]. - The company has not issued a formal response to the latest accident, contrasting with its previous actions following an earlier incident in March [8][15]. Group 2: Safety Standards and Regulatory Changes - The recent accidents have prompted the introduction of stricter safety standards for electric vehicles, particularly concerning battery safety and automated driving systems [12][14]. - New national standards have been proposed, including requirements for the safety of battery systems and door handles, reflecting the industry's need to address safety concerns highlighted by recent incidents [13][14]. - The automotive brand's issues have coincided with the rollout of these new regulations, which aim to enhance safety measures in the rapidly evolving electric vehicle market [12][14]. Group 3: Company Leadership and Communication - The company's CEO, Lei Jun, has faced criticism for his handling of the situation, with a notable lack of direct communication regarding the safety issues and accidents [9][11]. - Despite the controversies, the company continues to promote its products, raising questions about its commitment to addressing safety concerns [5][10]. - Lei Jun has acknowledged the challenges of vehicle manufacturing but has not specifically addressed safety issues in recent public statements [11].