你骂AI越狠，它反而越聪明？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a study that reveals a counterintuitive finding: the more polite the prompt given to AI, the worse its performance, while rudeness leads to better results [3][26]. Group 1: Study Findings - The study conducted by researchers from Pennsylvania State University involved 50 multiple-choice questions across various subjects, testing different levels of politeness in prompts [22][25]. - Results showed that the "very polite" prompts had an accuracy of 80.8%, while "very rude" prompts achieved an accuracy of 84.8%, indicating a 4% improvement with rudeness [26][27]. - The study suggests that less effective models respond better to rude prompts, highlighting a trend where "the more you insult it, the smarter it gets" [28][29]. Group 2: Human Communication Insights - The article posits that politeness often conveys uncertainty in human interactions, as people tend to be polite when they are unsure or seeking help [34][38]. - In contrast, direct and rude communication signals clarity and certainty, prompting more effective responses from AI [42][44]. - The author draws parallels between human communication and AI interactions, suggesting that the AI's training data reflects a preference for directness over politeness [40][58]. Group 3: Philosophical Implications - The article raises philosophical questions about the nature of communication with AI, pondering whether humans should treat AI as a subordinate tool requiring harsh commands or reflect on their own communication habits [56][60]. - It emphasizes the importance of clear and direct language in interactions with AI, advocating for expressing needs without unnecessary politeness [62][65]. - The conclusion suggests that AI serves as a mirror reflecting human communication flaws, urging a shift towards more sincere and straightforward interactions [57][66].