2025年上半年上市寿险公司新业务价值敏感性分析：投资与费用敏感性双双降低，行业发展更具“韧性”！

Core Insights - The article discusses the 400th update of the "13精" database, focusing on the performance and sensitivity analysis of life insurance companies in China, particularly regarding their effective business value and new business value. Group 1: Sensitivity Testing Results - The sensitivity testing results indicate how changes in certain factors affect the effective business value (EBV) and new business value (NBV) of life insurance companies. For instance, a 50 basis point decrease in investment return assumptions leads to a -27.9% change in EBV and a -22.4% change in NBV for China Pacific Life Insurance [6][9]. - The trend shows that the impact of investment factors on the value structure of most life insurance companies is declining over time, with the exception of PICC Health, which has the lowest investment sensitivity among the analyzed companies [6][9]. - The effective business value of China Pacific Life Insurance under various scenarios demonstrates significant fluctuations based on changes in assumptions such as mortality rates and expense ratios [7][18]. Group 2: Business Value Analysis - The effective business value represents the present value of future profits from existing policies, while the new business value reflects the profitability of newly sold policies. Both values are crucial for assessing the growth potential and profitability of life insurance companies [5][6]. - The analysis highlights that the sensitivity of the effective business value varies across companies, with New China Life and PICC Life showing the highest investment sensitivity, indicating a greater proportion of income from investment-sensitive products [9][12]. - Conversely, Ping An Life and PICC Health exhibit lower investment sensitivity, suggesting a smaller share of income from such products [12]. Group 3: Expense Sensitivity - The expense sensitivity testing results indicate that the impact of expense factors on the value structure of all companies is also declining over time [15][18]. - Among the companies analyzed, PICC Life has the highest expense sensitivity, while Ping An Life has the lowest, reflecting differences in how companies manage expense pressures [18].