Core Viewpoint - The article discusses a significant controversy in the cosmetics industry related to the detection of the banned substance Sudan Red IV in various skincare products, raising consumer concerns and prompting investigations into the implicated brands [1][2]. Group 1: Incident Overview - A video by "Old Dad Evaluation" revealed the presence of Sudan Red IV in multiple skincare products, leading to widespread consumer anxiety [1][2]. - The source of the contamination was traced to a questionable raw material group containing fish gut extract, neem leaf extract, and moringa seed oil, with a detected concentration of 1170 ppm (1.17 g/kg) of Sudan Red [2][3]. - Over 800 products have been identified as potentially containing the problematic raw material group, affecting more than 400 brands, including both international and domestic names [4]. Group 2: Health Implications - Sudan Red is classified as a synthetic industrial dye and is listed as a Group 3 carcinogen by the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), indicating it is an animal carcinogen but not proven to be carcinogenic to humans [6][7]. - The National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) has explicitly banned Sudan Red IV in cosmetics, highlighting the serious regulatory implications of its presence [7][11]. - Experts suggest that while the immediate risk from topical application may be lower than ingestion, long-term exposure could pose cumulative health risks [10][11]. Group 3: Brand Responses and Market Impact - Many implicated brands have responded minimally, with some products being removed from online platforms, while others remain available for purchase [12][14]. - Brands like Kiehl's and others have emphasized compliance with regulations but have not disclosed plans for testing their products for Sudan Red [14][15]. - The controversy has led to consumer confusion and anxiety, with reports of difficulties in obtaining refunds for potentially contaminated products [17][18]. Group 4: Regulatory and Industry Insights - The article highlights the challenges in ensuring product safety, noting that not all banned substances are routinely tested in cosmetics, which raises concerns about consumer safety [14][15]. - The presence of Sudan Red IV in cosmetics underscores the need for stricter oversight and transparency in ingredient sourcing and labeling within the beauty industry [18].
苏丹红从餐桌“杀”上脸?科颜氏、花西子卷入,化妆品界上演“罗生门”
 凤凰网财经·2025-10-24 13:38
