作为一个AI博主，我劝你先别急着用AI。

Core Viewpoint - The article emphasizes the importance of developing personal taste and skills through deliberate practice before heavily relying on AI tools for creative work. It argues that while AI can assist in the creative process, true expertise and unique perspectives come from extensive hands-on experience and understanding of one's craft [2][34][36]. Group 1: AI and Creative Process - AI can be a powerful tool for generating content, but it should not replace the foundational skills and personal insights that come from manual practice [34][36]. - The author uses AI to assist in writing, with AI contributions varying from 0% to 40% depending on the type of content, highlighting that core ideas and insights must come from the individual [3][4][5]. - The process of selecting and refining AI-generated content is crucial and relies on the individual's judgment and taste, which cannot be replaced by AI [11][12][17]. Group 2: Importance of Deliberate Practice - The article advocates for at least 1000 hours of deliberate practice in one's field to build foundational skills and personal taste, which are essential for effective use of AI [25][35]. - This practice should be largely independent of AI to ensure that the individual develops a deep understanding of their craft [26][30]. - The author draws parallels to the "10,000-hour rule," suggesting that while AI can accelerate learning, the hands-on experience remains irreplaceable [24][35]. Group 3: The Role of Personal Taste - Personal taste is described as a critical component of creative work, which is developed through extensive exposure to quality content and hands-on practice [18][22][29]. - The article warns against the risk of relying too heavily on AI, which may lead to a decline in personal standards and creativity [20][36]. - Ultimately, the ability to leverage AI effectively hinges on having a unique perspective and understanding of what constitutes quality work [36][40].