“美军航母摔飞机因电磁攻击”？中国军号发文

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent incidents involving the U.S. Navy's aircraft crashes in the South China Sea, suggesting that fuel quality issues may be a contributing factor rather than external attacks [3][7][9]. Summary by Sections Aircraft Crashes - On October 26, two U.S. Navy aircraft, an MH-60R helicopter and an F/A-18F fighter jet, crashed in the South China Sea shortly after taking off from the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier, raising concerns about the safety and operational integrity of U.S. military assets [3][4]. Speculations and Responses - Initial reactions included speculation about possible electromagnetic attacks from a "mysterious country," but this was dismissed as unlikely due to the presence of a robust carrier strike group monitoring the area [4][7]. - President Trump suggested that the crashes might be related to fuel quality issues, indicating that investigations would be conducted to determine the cause [7][9]. Fuel Quality Concerns - Both aircraft used the same type of aviation fuel, JP-8, which raises the possibility that they were refueled with a contaminated batch, leading to mechanical failures [9]. - The article highlights potential sources of fuel contamination, including past corruption cases involving military supply chains and the aging infrastructure of the USS Nimitz, which is 50 years old and has previously experienced maintenance issues [9][20]. Historical Context - The article references a series of past incidents involving the U.S. Navy in the South China Sea, coining the term "South China Sea curse" to describe the frequency of accidents and mishaps in the region [11][12][14]. - It argues that these incidents reflect a broader issue of U.S. military strategy and operational challenges, suggesting that the U.S. is overextending itself in distant waters for the sake of demonstrating military power [15][22]. Strategic Implications - The article concludes that the crashes are indicative of a disconnect between U.S. strategic ambitions and operational realities, suggesting that the U.S. military's aggressive posture in the South China Sea may lead to further accidents and operational failures [22].