价值研究所|老铺黄金,难造“不破金身”
中国基金报·2025-10-29 05:05

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the challenges faced by Laopu Gold due to its "zero-hedging" strategy amidst fluctuating gold prices, raising questions about its valuation logic and reliance on brand value versus gold price volatility [2]. Group 1: Fundraising and Financial Strategy - Laopu Gold has raised a total of HKD 54 billion through two rounds of high-profile share placements within five months, with the latest round netting approximately HKD 27.07 billion [3][6]. - The company has nearly exhausted the funds from its previous fundraising, indicating a monthly cash burn of about HKD 5.4 billion [6]. - The recent fundraising is primarily aimed at stockpiling gold (70%), with a smaller portion allocated for store expansion (10%) and working capital (20%) [6]. Group 2: Market Conditions and Valuation - The timing of Laopu Gold's fundraising coincides with a significant drop in gold prices, which saw a decline of over 6% in just a few days, raising concerns about the sustainability of its high valuation [6]. - The estimated price-to-earnings ratio for Laopu Gold is between 25 to 30 times, compared to traditional gold jewelry stocks, which are valued at 10 to 15 times [6]. Group 3: Zero-Hedging Strategy - Laopu Gold's "zero-hedging" strategy, which avoids using financial instruments to mitigate gold price risks, ties its cash flow stability closely to gold price fluctuations [10]. - This strategy allows the company to benefit from rising gold prices but necessitates reliance on external financing to maintain operations and inventory levels [10]. - The correlation between Laopu Gold's stock price and gold prices is notably high, with a correlation coefficient of 0.94 [10]. Group 4: Brand Positioning and Market Comparison - Laopu Gold's target consumer demographic overlaps significantly (77.3%) with luxury brands like LV and Hermes, yet its approach to managing raw material price volatility differs from these established brands [14]. - Unlike Laopu Gold, luxury brands typically prioritize risk management to protect brand value from raw material cost fluctuations, with Hermes maintaining a gross margin of over 70%, compared to Laopu Gold's 38% [14]. - The article suggests that Laopu Gold's brand identity may be weakening, as its products are increasingly tied to the intrinsic value of gold rather than brand prestige [15].