财政部介入！治理“1000元中标300万仪器”之类异常低价现象

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the widespread issue of abnormally low pricing in government procurement of scientific instruments, which has garnered significant attention from the industry and central media, prompting action from relevant government departments [2][3]. Summary by Sections Abnormal Low Pricing Cases - A specific case was reported where a procurement project with a budget of 3 million yuan was awarded for only 1,000 yuan, illustrating the prevalence of such low-bid situations in the scientific instrument sector [2]. Government Response - On October 28, the Ministry of Finance of the People's Republic of China released a draft notice aimed at addressing the issue of abnormal low pricing in government procurement [3]. Key Measures Proposed - Source Control: Procurement officials are required to set reasonable maximum prices based on market research and historical data, and to avoid solely pursuing low prices [7]. - Dynamic Review: Bids that are 50% below the average, 50% below the second-lowest bid, or 45% below the maximum price will trigger an abnormal low-price review, requiring suppliers to provide cost calculations [8]. - Responsibility Enforcement: There will be a focus on the actual performance of projects awarded at abnormal low prices, with legal accountability for non-compliant suppliers [10]. Shift in Procurement Philosophy - The draft aims to transition government procurement from a "low-price first" approach to a "quality for price" model, emphasizing the importance of quality alongside cost [11][13]. Significance of the Draft - The introduction of this draft represents a significant shift in the government procurement landscape, establishing clear standards for identifying abnormal low pricing and creating a comprehensive management system from demand to performance [14][15]. - It aims to curb harmful competition practices such as "one yuan bids" and "low bids with high maintenance costs," thereby ensuring fair competition and protecting the quality of government procurement [17]. Future Implications - The implementation of these policies is expected to enhance the business environment for government procurement and promote a new phase of quality competition, which is crucial for improving market order and the efficiency of fiscal fund usage [22].