Workflow
重大改革,最新解读
中国基金报·2025-11-01 05:15

Core Viewpoint - The recent release of the "Guidelines for the Selection and Use of Performance Benchmarks for Publicly Offered Securities Investment Funds" and the "Operational Details for Performance Benchmarks" by the China Securities Regulatory Commission aims to standardize the selection and use of performance benchmarks in the public fund industry, enhancing internal controls and protecting investors' rights [2][4]. Group 1: Performance Benchmark Significance - Performance benchmarks serve as a critical "baseline" for fund companies, reflecting the characteristics of the fund based on its type, investment scope, and strategy [4]. - The guidelines emphasize that benchmarks should accurately represent the product's positioning and investment style, and once selected, they should not be changed arbitrarily due to manager changes or short-term market fluctuations [4][5]. - The new regulations are expected to enhance the clarity and specificity of performance benchmarks, helping investors understand product characteristics and form reasonable return expectations [5][6]. Group 2: Control and Compliance - The guidelines aim to establish a comprehensive internal control system covering the selection, disclosure, monitoring, evaluation, and correction of benchmarks, addressing issues like "style drift" [5][6]. - By reinforcing the constraints of performance benchmarks, the guidelines will clarify product positioning and help prevent deviations from investment strategies, leading to clearer risk-return profiles [5][6]. Group 3: Linking Benchmarks to Manager Performance - A significant aspect of the reform is linking performance benchmarks to fund manager performance evaluations, which is expected to promote long-term value investing [6][7]. - The guidelines encourage fund managers to select benchmarks more prudently and manage deviations from them, fostering a performance evaluation system centered on long-term results [7][8]. - Enhanced external supervision related to benchmarks, including custodial oversight and information disclosure, is also part of the new framework to create a positive interaction ecosystem around benchmarks [7][8].