多位民营企业家，改判无罪

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme People's Court has released four typical cases regarding the protection of the rights and interests of private enterprises and entrepreneurs, emphasizing the importance of correcting wrongful judgments in property rights cases involving enterprises [2][3]. Group 1: Characteristics of the Typical Cases - The cases adhere to the principle of legality in criminal law, ensuring that individuals are not held criminally liable for actions that do not violate the law as amended [3]. - The cases reflect the principle of criminal law's restraint, distinguishing between economic disputes and economic crimes, thus preventing the misuse of criminal law in civil matters [4]. - The cases uphold the principle of equal legal protection, demonstrating that both private and state-owned enterprises are treated equally under the law, contributing to a fair business environment [5]. Group 2: Case Summaries - Case 1: In the case of Xie et al., the Supreme Court ruled that the defendants did not violate the amended Company Law regarding registered capital, leading to a retrial that declared them not guilty of the charge of falsely reporting registered capital [6][8][10]. - Case 2: In the case of Ye, the court found that while he had forged documents, he did not possess the intent to unlawfully possess others' property, resulting in a not guilty verdict for contract fraud [11][13]. - Case 3: In the case of Dou, the court determined that the mixing of personal and company assets made it impossible to establish a clear violation of property rights, leading to a not guilty verdict for embezzlement and misappropriation of funds [14][18]. - Case 4: In the case of Shi and Wang, the court clarified the conditions under which the transfer of equity occurred, ruling that the private entrepreneurs were entitled to the full payment for their shares, thus reinforcing the principle of equal protection for private enterprises [19][22].