特朗普：输了麻烦就大了

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. Supreme Court is questioning the legality of Trump's comprehensive tariff policy, with potential significant consequences if the government loses the case [1][4]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - The Supreme Court is reviewing the legality of Trump's tariff policy, with oral arguments lasting two and a half hours, during which both conservative and liberal justices raised sharp questions about the administration's legal basis [1]. - Trump's administration is defending its tariff policy by invoking the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977, which allows the president to regulate imports in certain emergencies [1][4]. - Previous court rulings have deemed the use of this act for implementing comprehensive tariffs as illegal [1]. Group 2: Political Implications - If the Supreme Court rules against the Trump administration, it could lead to significant restrictions on the current tariff policy, although it may not completely eliminate it [2][4]. - Trump's absence from the court proceedings was noted, as he expressed concerns about distracting from the case's importance [4]. - The administration's reliance on other legal frameworks to maintain tariff policies, regardless of the court's decision, has been highlighted by economic analysts [4]. Group 3: Court Composition - The Supreme Court consists of nine justices, with six being conservative and three liberal, which influences the potential outcomes of the case [3].