美妆“抗老”宣传罚单频现，这个双十一谁还在“擦边”冒险？

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the intense competition in the beauty and skincare sector during the Double Eleven shopping festival, highlighting the aggressive marketing strategies employed by brands, particularly the use of "anti-aging" claims that skirt regulatory boundaries [1][2][4]. Group 1: Marketing Strategies - Many beauty brands are using "anti-aging" and "anti-initial aging" as key marketing slogans to attract consumers, emphasizing the emotional appeal of retaining youth [2][8]. - Brands like Proya and Pechoin are prominently featuring "anti-aging" in their promotional materials, despite the lack of regulatory approval for such claims [8][12][16]. - New brands, such as Guyu, are also engaging in similar marketing tactics, creating dedicated live streams to promote their "anti-aging" products [19][21]. Group 2: Regulatory Concerns - The National Medical Products Administration has not recognized "anti-aging" as a valid claim within the 26 categories of cosmetic efficacy, making such marketing potentially non-compliant [3][25]. - Several brands have faced administrative penalties for making unapproved efficacy claims, indicating a growing scrutiny from regulatory bodies [5][29]. - Despite previous penalties, many brands continue to push the boundaries of compliance, suggesting a calculated risk approach to marketing [30][31]. Group 3: Consumer Demand and Brand Behavior - The strong consumer demand for "anti-aging" products drives brands to prioritize short-term sales over regulatory compliance, viewing the risks as manageable [30]. - The article suggests that the true boundary lies in the respect brands have for consumers, emphasizing the importance of ethical marketing practices [31][32].