2025三季度财险公司利润榜&成本率榜:人保第一,首破300亿!平安超150亿,太保ROE高,超9成险企盈利...
13个精算师·2025-11-13 14:46

Core Insights - The net profit of the property insurance industry in Q3 2025 has surpassed 700 billion, marking a significant increase driven by both investment income and underwriting profits [7][9][11] - The "Big Three" insurance companies continue to dominate, with notable profits from PICC exceeding 300 billion and Ping An exceeding 150 billion [26][28] - Insurers with a scale of around 300 billion have doubled their profits, with China Life exceeding 34 billion and others like ZhongAn and Sunshine surpassing 10 billion [31][33] - A total of 16 insurance companies turned losses into profits, with BYD Insurance achieving profitability largely due to a zero commission rate [34][38] Profit Performance - In Q3 2025, 86 property insurance companies reported a total net profit of 778 billion, an increase of approximately 271 billion or over 53% year-on-year [8][11][19] - The average investment return rate for these companies rose to 3.03%, up from 2.05% in the previous year [11][14] - The overall cost ratio for the industry has improved, with over 60% of companies reporting a decrease in their comprehensive cost ratio [14][28] Company Rankings - The top three companies, known as the "Big Three," accounted for 74% of the industry's net profit, with PICC contributing 115 billion alone [19][26] - The profit rankings show that PICC leads with 336.29 billion, followed by Ping An with 155.55 billion, and Taiping with 87.67 billion [21][22][26] - Companies with profits exceeding 10 billion include China Life, ZhongAn, Sunshine, and Dadi, reflecting a strong recovery in the industry [31][33] Losses and Challenges - Despite the overall positive performance, 8 companies reported losses, with Qianhai United being the most significant at -0.64 billion [40][41] - The losses are primarily concentrated in smaller insurance companies, which struggle with high cost ratios and insufficient premium income [44][45] - Companies like Longjiang and Rongsheng have faced continuous losses due to high comprehensive cost ratios, making it difficult to offset losses with investment income [44][45]