国防部、外交部、国台办、人民日报、中国军号等，集体发声！

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the provocative remarks made by Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida regarding Taiwan, suggesting potential military intervention, which has drawn strong responses from various Chinese government departments and officials [1][10][20]. Defense Ministry Response - The Defense Ministry criticized Kishida's comments as a serious violation of China's sovereignty and a dangerous provocation, warning that any reckless actions by Japan would lead to severe consequences [2][3][4]. - It emphasized that Taiwan is an internal matter for China and any foreign interference is unacceptable, reiterating the historical context of Japan's past aggression [3][6]. Foreign Ministry Response - The Foreign Ministry condemned Kishida's statements as a blatant interference in China's internal affairs and a challenge to the one-China principle, demanding Japan retract its remarks [5][11][20]. - It highlighted the historical responsibility Japan holds regarding Taiwan and called for a deep reflection on its past actions [11][15]. Historical Context - The article references the 80th anniversary of the victory in the Anti-Japanese War and Taiwan's recovery, stressing that Japan's past colonial rule over Taiwan and its wartime atrocities should inform its current stance [6][10][15]. - It questions Japan's intentions in light of its militaristic history and warns against repeating past mistakes [12][20]. Taiwan's Status - Taiwan is reaffirmed as an inseparable part of China, with the resolution of the Taiwan issue being a matter solely for the Chinese people, free from external interference [14][21]. - The article warns that any attempt by Japan to intervene militarily in Taiwan would be viewed as an act of aggression, prompting a strong response from China [8][12][18]. Conclusion - The article concludes with a firm stance that any foreign attempts to disrupt China's unity will be met with resolute opposition, emphasizing the determination of the Chinese government and people to safeguard national sovereignty [16][22].