玉渊谭天：中方已做好对日实质反制准备

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses China's strong diplomatic and military response to Japan's recent provocative statements regarding Taiwan, emphasizing that China is prepared for substantial countermeasures if Japan continues its aggressive stance [5][10][20]. Group 1: Diplomatic Actions - China's Ministry of Foreign Affairs summoned the Japanese ambassador, marking a significant diplomatic escalation, as the term "奉示" (to convey a message) was used, indicating a higher-level governmental response [5][7]. - The Chinese government has expressed that Japan must bear all consequences if it continues its interference in China's internal affairs, highlighting a shift from urging Japan to stop its actions to a more confrontational stance [5][10]. Group 2: Military Implications - The phrase "迎头痛击" (to strike back decisively) was used for the first time in a diplomatic context between China and Japan, signaling that China is ready for military responses if necessary [15][20]. - China's military capabilities are emphasized, with references to its naval strength and readiness to respond to any military provocations from Japan [18][20]. Group 3: Historical Context and International Order - The article notes that this year marks the 80th anniversary of China's victory in the Anti-Japanese War, framing Japan's actions as a threat to regional peace and a challenge to the post-World War II international order [20][23]. - Japan's recent military rhetoric is viewed as a violation of international law and the principles established after World War II, which restrict its military actions [21][23]. Group 4: Broader Regional Reactions - Other countries in the region, including Russia and South Korea, have expressed concerns over Japan's militaristic rhetoric, indicating that Japan's actions are not only problematic for China but also for its neighbors [23]. - The article suggests that Japan's narrative of a "survival crisis" echoes historical patterns that led to past aggressions, raising alarms about potential future conflicts [23].