98%用户曾下载的电脑管家，在暗算小白用户

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the resurgence of concerns regarding "rogue software" in the Chinese PC ecosystem, particularly focusing on the security software "Ludashi" and its alleged deceptive practices in promoting third-party software and manipulating web traffic for profit [1][2]. Group 1: Allegations Against Ludashi - A recent report by Huorong identified nearly 30 domestic software programs, including Ludashi, as engaging in traffic hijacking and malicious promotion [1]. - The report claims that Ludashi uses fake close buttons to trick users into downloading unwanted software and inserts rebate parameters into legitimate links, allowing it to siphon off commissions from user searches without their consent [6][8]. - Ludashi's parent company, Chengdu Qilu Technology Co., Ltd., has seen a decline in user engagement and revenue, leading to a reliance on advertising for income, which now constitutes 99.9% of its revenue [14][15]. Group 2: Technical Mechanisms of Promotion - The report outlines various promotional tactics employed by the implicated software, including malicious promotion through deceptive user interactions and web link manipulation [4][6]. - A cloud control configuration module was identified as a key component in executing these promotional strategies, allowing for real-time adjustments based on user behavior [8][9]. - The software reportedly employs sophisticated evasion tactics, such as monitoring user browsing history to avoid targeting technically savvy individuals [9][10]. Group 3: Industry Context and Legal Challenges - The article highlights the broader issue of "rogue software" in the PC industry, which has persisted for over a decade, with users often facing difficulties in seeking redress due to high costs and lack of clear evidence [2][17]. - Legal experts note that while there are laws against deceptive practices, enforcement remains challenging due to the technical nature of these software behaviors and the difficulty in gathering evidence [18][19]. - The article suggests that regulatory measures need to be strengthened to deter such practices and encourage software companies to adopt legitimate business models [20].