精神暴力也是家暴，最高法点名PUA第一案

Core Viewpoint - The Supreme Court of China has emphasized that both physical and psychological violence constitute domestic violence, highlighting the importance of recognizing mental abuse as a serious issue in domestic settings [1][5]. Group 1: Case Summaries - The case of Mou Linhan (牟林翰) is noted as a significant example of psychological abuse, where continuous verbal humiliation led to the victim's suicide, resulting in a conviction for abuse [4][5]. - Another case involved a husband threatening self-harm, which was classified as psychological violence, demonstrating that threats of self-harm can create a climate of fear and control within domestic relationships [6][5]. - A case involving Xu (许) and Zheng (郑) highlighted the court's recognition of the value of domestic labor, awarding compensation to the victim for her contributions as a full-time homemaker and acknowledging the impact of domestic violence on her life [8][9]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The Supreme Court's ruling indicates that individuals in stable cohabiting relationships can be recognized as "family members" under the law, expanding the definition of domestic violence to include psychological abuse [4][10]. - The court's decisions reflect a commitment to protecting victims of domestic violence, ensuring that psychological abuse is treated with the same seriousness as physical violence [5][9]. - The rulings also align with international standards, such as the Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women, emphasizing the need for legal recognition of women's contributions in domestic settings [9][10].