FLUX.2开源了，但是我好像也看到了小公司的无力。

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the current state of the AI drawing model FLUX, highlighting its decline in popularity compared to newer models like Nano Banana Pro, which is powered by Gemini 3 Pro, a leading multimodal model in the industry [4][5][41]. Group 1: Product Overview - FLUX has released four base models and one VAE model, with two of them being closed-source [8][9]. - The models include Pro and Flex, which are the most powerful but not open-source [9]. - An open-source model called klein is expected to be released soon [11]. Group 2: Performance Comparison - The article provides a comparison between FLUX and Nano Banana Pro, noting that FLUX's outputs appear less impressive when using the same prompts [15][41]. - Specific prompts used in testing demonstrate the differences in output quality, with FLUX struggling to match the detail and accuracy of Nano Banana Pro [20][22][41]. Group 3: Knowledge and Understanding - The article emphasizes that modern AI models must possess a deep understanding of the world, which is a significant factor in their performance [76][79]. - Nano Banana Pro's success is attributed to its backing by a powerful multimodal model, while FLUX relies on Mistral-3 24B, which is less capable [41][42]. Group 4: Industry Trends - The article notes a trend where smaller companies and models are increasingly falling behind as larger companies invest heavily in resources and technology [63][64]. - The competitive landscape is described as a "dimensionality reduction strike," where smaller players are unable to keep up with the advancements made by larger firms [75][76]. Group 5: Open Source and Community Impact - Despite its challenges, FLUX's open-source nature is seen as a valuable asset for small businesses and individual developers, allowing them to build upon its foundation [82][84]. - The article acknowledges the heroic efforts of the FLUX team, despite the challenges they face in a resource-driven market [85][87].