一夜之间，两家A股公司退市，监管释放重要信号

Core Viewpoint - The A-share market is demonstrating a "zero tolerance" attitude towards major illegal delisting behaviors, as evidenced by the recent forced delisting of *ST Dongtong and *ST Suwu due to severe violations of regulations [1][5][9] Summary by Sections Major Violations and Delisting - On November 25, *ST Dongtong and *ST Suwu received administrative penalty decisions from the China Securities Regulatory Commission (CSRC), leading to their stocks being suspended from trading starting November 26 [1][5] - Since 2025, the number of companies facing major illegal delisting has reached 13, marking a historical high [1][6] - *ST Dongtong engaged in financial fraud through its subsidiary for four consecutive years and used false data in a 2022 private placement, constituting fraudulent issuance [3][4] - *ST Suwu concealed its actual controlling shareholder and systematically inflated revenue, with related party fund occupation reaching 1.693 billion yuan, accounting for 96.09% of the company's net assets [1][5] Regulatory Changes and Enforcement - The recent delistings reflect a significant change in regulatory attitudes, driven by the continuous improvement of delisting systems, which now clearly state that companies with three or more years of fraud will be decisively removed [1][6] - New regulations have lowered the thresholds for identifying fraudulent activities, allowing more companies with long-term fraudulent behaviors to be exposed [6][10] - The updated standards for financial fraud delisting include specific thresholds for fraudulent amounts and their proportions relative to financial indicators [6][10] Comprehensive Governance System - A comprehensive governance system is being established to combat financial fraud, including holding accomplices accountable and utilizing technology for "penetrating" regulatory networks [2][9] - The regulatory framework emphasizes a three-pronged punishment system (administrative, civil, and criminal) for financial fraud cases, showcasing a firm stance against illegal activities in the capital market [7][9] Investor Protection and Market Ecology - The increase in major illegal delisting cases reflects the regulatory body's commitment to a "zero tolerance" policy towards financial fraud and the determination to dismantle the fraud "ecosystem" [9][10] - The CSRC has issued guidelines to enhance investor protection, particularly in cases of major illegal delisting, encouraging companies to take proactive measures to compensate affected investors [9][10]