王不见王，俄乌和平进程正紧张推进中

Group 1 - The core viewpoint of the article suggests that Ukraine's commitment to "not reclaim its occupied sovereign territory by military means" is a strategic maneuver by Europe (EU) to continue sanctions and isolate Russia, pressuring it to return the occupied territories [1][7]. - The recent developments in the Russia-Ukraine peace process include the announcement of a 28-point plan by the U.S. on November 19, which was later modified to a 19-point plan during discussions in Geneva involving representatives from the U.S., EU, and Ukraine [2][3]. - The discussions have been characterized by a tight schedule, with significant information being leaked, leading to a lack of transparency regarding the specific contents of the 19-point plan [3][4]. Group 2 - There is a consensus among the U.S. and Ukraine that any future agreement must fully uphold Ukraine's sovereignty, indicating that territorial issues may either be omitted from the final agreement or expressed in a way that allows both sides to maintain their positions [6][7]. - The proposal for a "reassurance force" led by the UK and France aims to establish a multi-national force post-peace agreement, although its feasibility remains uncertain [6][8]. - The dynamics between U.S. and Ukrainian leadership suggest a reluctance from both sides to engage directly, particularly regarding contentious issues that could have significant historical implications for Ukraine's leadership [9].