国家能源局关于七起电网公平开放违规问题的通报

Core Viewpoint - The National Energy Administration has reported seven typical violations regarding the fair and open access of the power grid, highlighting significant issues in the implementation of regulations and the need for improvement in service levels [3][7]. Summary by Sections - Violation of Distributed Photovoltaic Project Connection Costs: A power grid company in Shanxi Province transferred the connection engineering costs of 540 distributed photovoltaic projects to the project owners, increasing their investment costs. This accounted for 71.6% of all connection projects during the same period, involving approximately 230 million yuan [3]. - Cost Transfer to Renewable Energy Companies: Since September 2021, a power grid company in Guangxi has shifted the costs of substation intervals and equipment that it should have borne to renewable energy companies, affecting over 1.5 billion yuan across 97 projects [4]. - Unreasonable Fees Charged: From 2023 to 2024, a power grid company in Jiangxi charged unreasonable maintenance fees to power generation companies, totaling over 130 million yuan, violating multiple regulations [5]. - Delayed Repurchase of Connection Projects: A power grid company in Jiangsu has been slow in repurchasing 48 connection projects built by renewable energy companies, with an estimated 700 million yuan involved, contrary to regulatory expectations [5]. - Exceeding Time Limits for Connection Processes: Since September 2021, a power grid company in Inner Mongolia has exceeded the stipulated time limits for processing connection applications for 119 centralized renewable energy projects, averaging a delay of 9 days [6]. - Increased Difficulty in Connection Services: A power grid company in Hunan imposed additional requirements on power generation companies for connection design approvals, which were unnecessary and exceeded national standards [6]. - Disorganized Processing of Distributed Photovoltaic Projects: Since January 2022, a power grid company in Guizhou has shown discrepancies in the processing times of over 13,000 distributed photovoltaic projects, indicating attempts to circumvent regulatory time assessments [6][7].