美国最新报告：不允许任何国家过于强大

Core Viewpoint - The U.S. National Security Strategy report emphasizes prioritizing the Western Hemisphere, criticizing Europe, downplaying terrorism threats, and aiming for a balance between external commitments and internal capabilities [1][2]. Group 1: Monroe Doctrine and Intervention in Latin America - The report introduces the "Trump Doctrine" as a modern version of the Monroe Doctrine, asserting U.S. dominance in the Western Hemisphere [1]. - It outlines objectives such as preventing mass immigration, using lethal force against drug cartels, and ensuring U.S. access to strategic locations in Latin America [1][2]. - Analysts suggest this indicates a significant increase in U.S. resources allocated to intelligence, military, law enforcement, and economic strategies in Latin America [2]. Group 2: Global Military Presence Adjustment - The report calls for a "reallocation" of U.S. military resources, reducing presence in regions deemed less critical to national security [3]. - Experts interpret this as a decline in the importance of Europe, the Middle East, and Africa in U.S. foreign policy [3]. Group 3: Strategic Military and Economic Goals - The report aims to alleviate global security burdens by encouraging allies to take on more defense responsibilities and avoiding costly "forever wars" [4]. - It emphasizes the need to rebuild the U.S. defense industrial base and maintain dominance in key technological fields [5]. - The report also highlights the end of the era where the Middle East dominated U.S. foreign policy, although skepticism remains about the actual shift in focus [5]. Group 4: Anti-Immigration and Anti-Globalization Stance - The report reflects a vision of global order based on "America First," characterized by anti-immigration and anti-globalization sentiments [6]. - It attributes many global challenges to immigration, asserting that large-scale immigration undermines traditional powers' cultural and economic dominance [6]. - The report contains strong criticisms of Europe, warning of severe consequences due to immigration policies and economic stagnation [6]. Group 5: Power Dynamics and Global Influence - The report indicates a more inward-looking and narrow view of U.S. security, while simultaneously asserting that no country should become too powerful to threaten U.S. interests [7]. - It continues to advocate for a strong power logic in international relations, emphasizing that great powers have significant influence [7]. - The report has been described as an attempt to impose the President's worldview selectively on the global stage [7].