“美国战略重大转向”，欧洲又惊又气！

Core Viewpoint - The latest National Security Strategy (NSS) from the U.S. marks a significant shift in American foreign policy, moving away from traditional ideologies and emphasizing a pragmatic approach focused on national interests and economic security [3][8]. Summary by Sections U.S. Foreign Policy Principles - The NSS outlines that U.S. foreign, defense, and intelligence policies must adhere to several core principles, with a focus on core national security interests rather than generalized ones. The five core interests include: ensuring stability and dominance in the Western Hemisphere, maintaining economic security and a free and open Indo-Pacific, safeguarding European security and cultural health, preventing Middle Eastern dominance by hostile forces, and establishing technological superiority [8][9]. Critique of European Allies - The NSS sharply criticizes European allies, suggesting they engage in an ideological struggle against "woke" trends and highlighting deeper issues such as political freedom erosion and demographic changes due to immigration. It warns of a potential loss of civilization in Europe and calls for U.S. action to help correct its current trajectory [5][11][12]. Economic Security Emphasis - The document emphasizes that economic security is foundational to national security, advocating for a "rebalancing" of global trade relations, increased access to critical minerals, and monitoring of global supply chains. It also promotes the idea of strategic tariffs and new technologies to drive U.S. reindustrialization [17][18]. Focus on the Western Hemisphere - The NSS indicates a renewed focus on Latin America, suggesting the re-establishment of Monroe Doctrine principles to restore U.S. influence in the region. It emphasizes the importance of securing exclusive contracts for U.S. companies in countries heavily reliant on American support [14][15]. Shift from Interventionism - The NSS reflects a clear non-interventionist stance, setting high standards for foreign intervention and advocating for flexible realism in international relations. It suggests that the U.S. should not impose democratic changes on other nations but rather seek peaceful commercial relationships [9][10].