价值超1300万虚拟币待认领，警方：六个月无人认领将上缴国库

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the seizure of 1.9 million USDT (Tether) worth over 13 million yuan by the police in Hubei Province, highlighting the legal implications and the nature of virtual currencies in criminal cases [1][3][5]. Group 1: Seizure of Virtual Currency - The Hubei police announced the seizure of approximately 1.9 million USDT during investigations into extortion and personal information infringement cases, with the original owner currently unidentified [3][5]. - The announcement allows the rightful owner to claim the virtual currency within six months by providing legal proof and identification [3][6]. Group 2: Legal Implications - The police's announcement serves as a typical criminal asset disposal action, aimed at clarifying ownership and ensuring lawful handling of seized assets [6][7]. - The announcement also acts as a reminder for potential victims to come forward if they have evidence related to the crimes [7]. Group 3: Nature of Virtual Currency - USDT is a stablecoin pegged to the US dollar, with its value typically fluctuating around 1 USDT ≈ 1 USD; the current market value of 1.9 million USDT is approximately 13.4 million yuan based on exchange rates [6][7]. - Virtual currencies are recognized as having property value but do not possess legal tender status in China, meaning losses from illegal trading activities are self-borne risks [8]. Group 4: Law Enforcement and Regulation - The police's actions reflect a balance between strict regulation of illegal financial activities involving virtual currencies and the legal protection of potential victims [8][9]. - The case illustrates that virtual currencies can be traced and that attempts to conceal illegal gains using them will face legal repercussions [9]. Group 5: Practical Guidance for Claiming Assets - To reclaim the seized USDT, the rightful owner must provide three types of core evidence: transaction records of USDT purchases, proof of fund sources, and documentation of forced transfers due to criminal activities [9]. - Legal provisions exist for the return of assets that are unrelated to the case, emphasizing the importance of clear ownership in asset recovery [9].