全球秩序重构，如何迎接“亚洲世纪”？丨两说

Core Viewpoint - The dialogue between Yin Fan and Ma Kai Shuo emphasizes the need to understand the underlying logic and spiritual core of the changing world order, moving beyond superficial analysis [1] Group 1: Strategic Determination and Civilizational Resilience - Ma Kai Shuo highlights that the core issue in the US-China rivalry is the presence or absence of strategic thinking, with China possessing a comprehensive long-term strategy while the US lacks one [2] - The evolution of China's position from being caught off guard to becoming a power that can assert itself is attributed to decades of systematic regional management and strategic determination [2] - This shift is viewed not merely as a transfer of power but as a re-emergence of different civilizational logics on the global stage [2] Group 2: Emergence of a New Civilizational Paradigm - Ma Kai Shuo introduces the "3M" framework, which stands for Multicivilizational, Multipolar, and Multilateral, indicating a significant shift in global dynamics [4] - "Multicivilizational" signifies fundamental equality, marking the end of the two-century-long Western-centric narrative, allowing various civilizations to contribute to history [6] - "Multipolar" reflects a universal awakening of subjectivity, where countries like India, Brazil, and ASEAN are no longer mere pawns but key players with independent agendas [8] - "Multilateralism" is framed as essential for survival, emphasizing the interconnectedness of global challenges such as climate change and pandemics [8] Group 3: Awakening of the "Silent Majority" - The perspective of the "Global South" is crucial, as countries in Africa, Latin America, and Southeast Asia view China's rise as an opportunity for development and infrastructure rather than a binary choice between the US and China [10] - These nations are actively participating in shaping new economic and political geographies through cooperation and negotiation [10] Group 4: A Call for a Shared Destiny - Ma Kai Shuo elevates the concept of the "Asian Century" to a level of human shared destiny, advocating for a worldview that emphasizes connection, balance, and long-term planning [12] - This perspective offers alternative thinking resources for global governance, which is often trapped in zero-sum thinking and short-termism [12] - The dialogue encourages a holistic view of the planet, urging individuals to consider their responsibilities within the context of a shared human home [12]