浙江严肃追责问责83人！

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the serious issues regarding ecological and environmental protection in Zhejiang Province, emphasizing the need for accountability and responsibility among local government officials and departments in addressing environmental damage and violations [1][11]. Group 1: Environmental Infrastructure Issues - Several cities and counties, including Ninghai County, Shaoxing Keqiao District, and others, have shown inadequate attention to environmental infrastructure, leading to severe pollution from improper sewage management and rainwater drainage systems [2][3]. - Specific cases include the failure of Zhuji City to regulate wastewater discharge from dyeing parks, resulting in non-compliant effluent entering rainwater systems [2]. Group 2: Construction Waste Management - Hangzhou has faced significant challenges with illegal dumping of construction waste, attributed to insufficient regulatory measures and lack of local disposal facilities [4][5]. - The article notes that various local governments, including those in Yuhang District and Tonglu County, have failed to effectively address complaints regarding illegal dumping, leading to environmental degradation [4][5]. Group 3: Marine Ecological Protection - In Wenzhou, there is a notable lack of awareness and action regarding marine ecological protection, with several counties experiencing ecological damage due to inadequate enforcement of regulations [7][8]. - Specific violations include illegal occupation of marine areas for tourism projects and non-compliance within national marine protected areas [7]. Group 4: Air Quality and Pollution Control - Cities such as Hangzhou, Huzhou, Jiaxing, and Shaoxing have struggled with air quality management, particularly during heavy pollution events, due to poor regulatory oversight of high-emission projects and non-compliance with environmental standards [9][10]. - The article indicates that local authorities have been ineffective in managing industrial emissions and monitoring vehicle inspection processes, contributing to air quality deterioration [9][10]. Group 5: Accountability Measures - The investigation led to accountability actions against 15 responsible units and 83 individuals, including disciplinary actions against various levels of officials, highlighting the commitment to enforcing environmental regulations [1][11]. - The article emphasizes the importance of learning from these issues to improve future environmental governance and uphold the principles of ecological civilization [11][12].