仪器信息网·2025-12-15 09:07Core Viewpoint - The revised version of the Biological Safety Act has been incorporated into the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) for fiscal year 2026, marking a significant legislative step since its introduction in 2024 [2]. Group 1: Legislative Changes - The revised act eliminates direct naming of specific companies, such as WuXi AppTec and BGI, and instead allows the White House and the Office of Management and Budget (OMB) to create a dynamic list of "biotechnology companies of concern" within one year after the act's passage [3]. - A three-year grace period is established for existing contracts to avoid immediate impacts, and Medicare Part B is explicitly exempted from restrictions, reducing opposition from large pharmaceutical companies [3]. - The act limits its scope to contracts governed by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), excluding commercial retail or non-federal funding transactions [3]. Group 2: Immediate and Long-term Implications - The removal of direct naming helps avoid "labeling" companies, providing them time to adjust their supply chains, while the grace period and existing contract exemptions lessen the act's immediate impact on current operations [4]. - However, long-term risks remain as the dynamic list created by the OMB may still include Chinese companies, which would prevent them from participating in federal direct procurement contracts [4]. - The core aim of the act is to "cut off federal funding to identified 'biotechnology companies of concern'," which could still affect Chinese firms due to potential associations with foreign adversaries [4]. - The act may trigger a ripple effect, leading to restrictions on Chinese companies in other sectors, such as medical IT and biological data [4].