同仁堂磷虾油采购价远低于正常水平

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the investigation by the Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee into the alleged fraudulent practices of Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd. regarding their Antarctic krill oil products, highlighting issues of product misrepresentation and consumer rights violations [3][4]. Group 1: Company Actions and Responses - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee held discussions with the distributors and manufacturers of the Antarctic krill oil product, revealing that the manufacturer, Anhui Hab Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., admitted to not adding the claimed "Antarctic krill oil" during production [3]. - The distributor, Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., denied knowledge of the alleged fraudulent activities and attempted to deflect responsibility during the discussions [3][4]. - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Committee urged the distributor to conduct a self-examination, provide truthful information to consumers, issue a sincere apology, and recall the problematic products for refunds and compensation [4]. Group 2: Product Pricing and Quality Issues - The products in question were sold at significantly low prices, with one bottle of "99% high-purity Antarctic krill oil" priced as low as 7.5 yuan for 60 capsules, raising concerns about the quality linked to the low procurement costs [3][4]. - The investigation indicated that the companies knowingly misrepresented the product's contents, claiming a phospholipid content of 43% while the actual product did not contain the advertised Antarctic krill oil [4]. Group 3: Legal Implications - Legal experts noted that the low procurement price of the products suggests that quality issues stem from cost-cutting measures, which could lead to significant legal ramifications for the involved companies [4]. - There is ongoing debate regarding a trademark infringement case initiated by Beijing Tongrentang Group against its subsidiary, with potential implications for the legitimacy of the subsidiary's use of the brand name [4].