教育部：高中要严格控制考试次数

Core Viewpoint - The Ministry of Education issued a notification to strengthen the management of daily examinations in primary and secondary schools, aiming to reduce the frequency of exams, improve their quality, enhance safety risk prevention, alleviate students' academic burdens, and promote their overall healthy development [1][3]. Group 1: Key Tasks and Measures - The notification outlines seven key tasks with 20 specific measures to address issues such as excessive exam frequency, low quality of exam questions, and disconnect between teaching and assessment [2][5]. - It emphasizes the need for a clear management responsibility structure across provincial, municipal, and county education departments, as well as research and examination institutions [4][5]. Group 2: Examination Frequency and Management - The notification mandates a reduction in exam frequency, specifying that primary school grades one and two should not have paper-and-pencil exams, while other grades should have one semester-end exam and possibly one mid-term exam for junior high [6][5]. - It prohibits regional or inter-school exams for non-graduating grades in primary and junior high schools, allowing only 1-2 mock exams for graduating grades during review periods [6][5]. Group 3: Question Management and Review - Strict guidelines for question management are established, requiring adherence to national curriculum standards and a focus on core competencies, while banning the purchase of exam questions from external sources [6][7]. - A robust review mechanism is to be implemented, ensuring compliance, political correctness, and scientific validity of exam content, with a minimum of three reviewers for each exam [7][8]. Group 4: Result Application and Evaluation - The notification promotes a shift to a grading system that de-emphasizes competition based on scores, encouraging a correct educational evaluation perspective [8][6]. - It aims to enhance the diagnostic and improvement functions of assessments, focusing on students' growth and potential rather than solely on scores [8][6]. Group 5: Capacity Building and Responsibility - The notification calls for enhanced training and support for teachers in exam question design and analysis, leveraging technology such as artificial intelligence in exam processes [8][6]. - A mechanism for accountability and supervision is to be established, allowing for public reporting of exam-related issues and ensuring that all parties involved in exam creation and review share responsibility [9][8].