美国点名多家欧洲巨头，威胁反制“收费”

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the escalating tensions between the U.S. and the EU regarding digital taxation and regulatory practices, highlighting the U.S. government's warning to retaliate against perceived discriminatory measures against American tech companies [3][5]. Group 1: U.S. Government's Position - The U.S. Trade Representative (USTR) has publicly named several European companies, warning that if the EU does not change its regulatory approach towards U.S. tech giants, the U.S. will have no choice but to retaliate [3][5]. - USTR's statement emphasizes that the U.S. will utilize all available tools to counteract what it views as unreasonable measures imposed by the EU [3][5]. - The U.S. has a long-standing dissatisfaction with the EU's digital services tax, which it perceives as a non-tariff trade barrier harming American businesses [5][6]. Group 2: Specific Companies Named - The USTR specifically mentioned European companies such as DHL, SAP, Siemens, Mistral, Capgemini, Publicis Groupe, Accenture, and Spotify as beneficiaries of a favorable operating environment in the U.S. [5]. - The U.S. has previously threatened to impose substantial tariffs on countries implementing digital taxes that it considers discriminatory [5][6]. Group 3: EU's Response - The European Commission responded by asserting that the EU is an open market where rules apply fairly to all companies, regardless of origin [10]. - EU Trade Commissioner Valdis Dombrovskis acknowledged the need for ongoing efforts to manage relations with the U.S. while maintaining a firm stance on digital and technological sovereignty [10][11]. - The EU has initiated new investigations into U.S. tech companies, including Google, Microsoft, Amazon, and Meta, indicating a continued commitment to regulatory oversight [11]. Group 4: Regulatory Developments - The EU is also working on simplifying regulations related to AI, cybersecurity, and data, aiming to reduce administrative burdens on European companies [11]. - There is a shift in the EU's regulatory approach, moving towards a more flexible model that does not apply a one-size-fits-all strategy, particularly benefiting data-intensive companies and small to medium enterprises [11].