Core Viewpoint - The article highlights the alarming findings regarding the quality of Antarctic krill oil products, particularly focusing on a product marketed by Beijing Tongrentang, which was found to contain no phospholipids despite claims of high purity and content [4][6][9]. Group 1: Product Quality Issues - A product labeled as "Beijing Tongrentang 99% High Purity Antarctic Krill Oil" was tested and found to have a phospholipid content of 0, contradicting its advertised claims of 43% [6][9]. - The product's distributor, Beijing Tongrentang (Sichuan) Health Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., and the manufacturer, Anhui Habao Pharmaceutical Co., Ltd., were implicated in the scandal, with the manufacturer admitting to not including the claimed Antarctic krill oil in production [12][13]. - The product was sold at approximately 60 yuan per bottle, while the production cost was only 3 to 3.7 yuan, raising questions about the pricing and quality of the product [14]. Group 2: Brand Trust and Reputation - The incident is part of a larger pattern of trust issues surrounding the Tongrentang brand, which has faced multiple controversies over product quality and misleading marketing practices [22][24]. - The article emphasizes that the trust erosion for a brand with over 350 years of history is detrimental, as each instance of compromised integrity undermines the brand's foundational values [33]. - The article calls attention to the broader implications for consumer confidence in health products, suggesting that such incidents can negatively impact overall consumption and market trust [29][30]. Group 3: Regulatory and Market Implications - The article points out the regulatory gaps and brand authorization issues that allow for such misleading products to enter the market, indicating a need for stricter oversight [32]. - The Shanghai Consumer Protection Commission is actively investigating the matter and has urged consumers to be cautious when purchasing health-related products [27]. - The article concludes that the presence of substandard products like the Antarctic krill oil not only harms consumer rights but also poses a risk to the growth of health consumption as a key driver of economic demand [28][29].
“虾”跑了，“南极磷虾油”造假谁最赚钱？