国资委完善央企追责制度！98种情形明确追责，6类情形可免责

Core Viewpoint - The State-owned Assets Supervision and Administration Commission (SASAC) has released the "Implementation Measures for Accountability of Central Enterprises for Violating Business Investment Responsibilities," which aims to strengthen the regulatory framework for state-owned enterprises (SOEs) and promote high-quality development by clarifying accountability for violations [1]. Summary by Sections Expansion of Accountability Scenarios - The new measures expand the accountability scenarios to 98 types across 13 areas, including group control, risk management, procurement management, engineering contracting, financial business, technological innovation, and overseas investment, increasing from 72 scenarios in the previous version [2]. Financial and Technological Accountability - Specific accountability scenarios in financial business and technological innovation have been outlined. In financial business, six types of violations are specified, including failure to follow decision-making procedures for investments in financial institutions and illegal fundraising activities. In technological innovation, five types of fraudulent behaviors are included, such as falsifying research progress and misappropriating scientific funding [3]. Clear Responsibility Classification - The measures maintain the classification of asset loss severity, defining general losses as below 5 million yuan, significant losses between 5 million and 50 million yuan, and major losses above 50 million yuan. Responsibility is categorized into direct, supervisory, and leadership responsibilities [4]. Exemption Conditions for Accountability - To encourage proactive management, the measures specify six conditions under which SOE management personnel may be exempt from accountability, such as unforeseen external changes affecting project outcomes and providing dissenting opinions in collective decisions [5]. Enhanced Regulatory Process - The measures outline a comprehensive process for accountability, including acceptance, preliminary verification, classification, investigation, and rectification. They emphasize the importance of using information technology to enhance accountability processes and establish a robust risk prevention mechanism [6].