南京博物院藏仇英名作现身拍卖市场，最新情况！

Core Viewpoint - The recent emergence of the Ming Dynasty painting "Jiangnan Spring" by Qiu Ying from the Nanjing Museum's collection has sparked discussions regarding the recognition and handling of donated artifacts by state-owned museums, as well as the protection of the rights of donors [2]. Group 1: Background and Donation Details - In 1959, Pang Zenghe and his family donated 137 pieces of ancient paintings from the collection of renowned collector Pang Laichen to the Nanjing Museum, including the "Jiangnan Spring" scroll [4]. - Pang Shuling, the granddaughter of Pang Laichen, asserts that the donated artifacts are genuine and that the museum's designation of five pieces as forgeries has severely damaged her family's reputation [4][11]. Group 2: Authentication and Dispute - The Nanjing Museum conducted two rounds of expert authentication in 1961 and 1964, both concluding that the "Jiangnan Spring" scroll was a forgery [6][8]. - In June 2025, Pang Shuling discovered that five artworks, including the "Jiangnan Spring," were missing from the museum's collection, which the museum claimed were removed due to being classified as forgeries [7]. Group 3: Legal Proceedings and Claims - On November 20, 2025, Pang Shuling filed a lawsuit against the Nanjing Museum, seeking clarification on the whereabouts of the missing artworks and their return [7]. - The museum's legal representatives argue that ownership of the donated items transferred to the state upon donation, and thus, there is no obligation to return the items to the donor or their heirs [11][12]. Group 4: Market Implications and Regulatory Attention - The incident has raised concerns in the art market regarding the provenance of auction items, emphasizing the need for museums to provide clear evidence of compliance and legality when artifacts are deaccessioned [12]. - Authorities have taken notice of the situation and are forming an investigation team to look into the matter [13].