中信证券资管违约，被判赔偿近3000万元

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent developments in the CITIC Securities asset management default case, highlighting a court ruling that requires CITIC Securities to compensate Fuanna for losses incurred from a failed investment product [1][5]. Group 1: Legal Proceedings - On December 25, Fuanna announced it had filed a lawsuit against CITIC Securities and China Merchants Bank Guangzhou Branch regarding a financial trust contract dispute, receiving a first-instance judgment that mandates CITIC Securities to compensate Fuanna for a principal loss of 29.3 million yuan [2][5]. - The court ruling states that CITIC Securities must pay Fuanna within 10 days of the judgment's effectiveness, and any subsequent recovery from the asset management plan will be split equally between Fuanna and CITIC Securities [5]. Group 2: Investment Details - In 2021, Fuanna invested 120 million yuan in a customized asset management plan from CITIC Securities, which defaulted on repayment after its maturity in March 2022 [3]. - The main holdings of the investment included products from Dongfanghong Money B and Beida Resources Hangzhou Haigang City, the latter being associated with a well-known "unfinished building" project that has defaulted [3]. Group 3: Financial Impact - As of the end of 2024, Fuanna had withdrawn 14.3023 million yuan from the management account of the investment product, with a remaining principal of 105.6977 million yuan and expected fixed income yet to be recovered [4]. - CITIC Securities reported that the net asset value of the investment product was 77.7261 million yuan at the end of 2024, and Fuanna has recognized a total impairment of 27.9716 million yuan related to the overdue amounts [4]. Group 4: Clarifications and Market Reactions - Following the default incident, there were market rumors suggesting that CITIC Securities might only act as a channel for the investment, which Fuanna clarified was untrue, asserting that CITIC was the actual investment manager and that there were no connections to the underlying assets [6].