原告向法官出示证据图，右下角竟带有“豆包AI”水印，法院处理了

Core Viewpoint - The article highlights a case where a court in Hubei, China, identified the use of AI technology to forge evidence in a housing rental dispute, emphasizing a "zero tolerance" approach to uphold judicial authority and the integrity of litigation [2]. Group 1: Case Details - In May 2024, a rental agreement was signed between Li and Xiong, with specific terms regarding rent payment and duration [3]. - After the rental period, Li sued Xiong for unpaid rent and utility fees, but failed to provide valid proof of the claims [3]. - Li's daughter, Dong, promised to submit utility meter photos as evidence but submitted images with a "Doubao AI generated" watermark, raising suspicion from the judge [3][4]. Group 2: Evidence Forgery and Consequences - Further investigation revealed inconsistencies in Dong's statements regarding the utility meter usage, leading to her eventual admission of evidence forgery [5]. - The judge educated Dong on the legal implications of using AI-generated photos as evidence, which constitutes forgery and disrupts litigation order [7]. - According to Chinese civil procedure law, such actions can lead to admonishment, fines, detention, or even criminal charges for severe cases [7][10]. Group 3: Judicial Response and Principles - The court decided to admonish Dong, considering her proactive admission and correction of the mistake, reinforcing the principle of "punishment combined with education" [11]. - The court emphasized that the submitted forged evidence would not be accepted, and the case would be judged based on authentic evidence [11]. - A reminder was issued that evidence is the foundation of litigation, and any forgery undermines the principle of good faith, disrupting judicial order [13].