刚刚！IPO暂缓审议

Core Viewpoint - The IPO application of Shenyang Guantai Vacuum Technology Co., Ltd. has been postponed for review by the Beijing Stock Exchange, indicating potential regulatory scrutiny or concerns regarding the company's financial disclosures and operational practices [1]. Group 1: Company Overview - Shenyang Guantai Vacuum Technology Co., Ltd. specializes in the research, development, manufacturing, and sales of vacuum equipment, with a focus on high-tech applications in the functional materials sector, particularly in the rare earth permanent magnet industry [3]. - The company was established in May 2013 and transitioned to a joint-stock company in January 2022, with its shares publicly traded on the National Equities Exchange and Quotations system since December 27, 2024 [3]. - The company has a total of 67.34 million shares before the current issuance and employs 274 people as of June 2025 [3]. Group 2: Shareholding Structure - Liu Shungang is the controlling shareholder, holding 66.23% of the company's shares directly and an additional 15.10% indirectly through Guantai Holdings and Guantai High-Tech, resulting in a total control of 81.33% of the shares [4]. Group 3: Financial Performance - The company's revenue for the reporting period was as follows: 280.53 million yuan in 2022, 311.52 million yuan in 2023, 378.83 million yuan in 2024, and an estimated 341.94 million yuan for the first nine months of 2025 [5][6]. - The net profit figures were reported as 44.26 million yuan in 2022, 73.03 million yuan in 2023, 68.94 million yuan in 2024, and an estimated 76.67 million yuan for the first nine months of 2025 [5][6]. - The company has shown a gross profit margin improvement from 27.32% in 2022 to 35.17% in 2025 [6]. Group 4: Listing Standards and Regulatory Concerns - The company selected listing standards based on a market capitalization of no less than 200 million yuan, with net profits in the last two years exceeding 15 million yuan and an average return on equity of at least 8% [7]. - The review meeting raised inquiries regarding the accuracy and sufficiency of revenue recognition, particularly concerning contracts with extended delivery and acceptance timelines, indicating potential issues with revenue recognition practices [8].