经济观察报·2026-01-03 04:20Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the recent control changes in Tianchuang Fashion and Aolian Electronics, highlighting the extended lock-up periods for shares as a sign of confidence from new shareholders in the companies' long-term prospects [2][10]. Group 1: Tianchuang Fashion - Tianchuang Fashion announced a control change plan on December 27, with the new shareholders committing to a five-year lock-up period for their shares, significantly exceeding the 18-month requirement set by the China Securities Regulatory Commission [2][3]. - The company reported revenues of 1.274 billion yuan, 1.099 billion yuan, and 744 million yuan for the first three quarters of 2023 to 2025, with continuous net losses [5]. - The share transfer agreement involves the transfer of 45.959 million shares from the controlling shareholder, Quanzhou Hetian Investment Partnership, and 37.7745 million shares from the second-largest shareholder, Hong Kong Gaochuang, at a price of 7.50 yuan per share, representing a 10% discount to the pre-suspension price of 8.33 yuan [5][6]. Group 2: Aolian Electronics - Aolian Electronics also announced a control change on December 27, with the new major shareholder, Chaocheng Innovation, committing to a five-year lock-up period for the shares acquired through a transfer agreement [7][8]. - The share transfer involves 32.6667 million shares, accounting for 19.09% of the total share capital of Aolian Electronics [7]. - Similar to Tianchuang Fashion, the extended lock-up period is seen as a strategy to stabilize the company and mitigate risks associated with potential restructuring failures [10]. Group 3: Market Implications - The extended lock-up periods for both companies signal a trend where new shareholders are willing to commit to longer-term investments, possibly due to the attractiveness of the industries involved and the associated risks [10][12]. - The article notes that the different lock-up periods among companies, such as the 18-month commitment from Youbang Diding, may reflect the varying levels of confidence in the respective industries and the potential for market speculation [12].