新华社发声：图穷匕见，不过如此

Core Viewpoint - The article criticizes the recent military actions by the United States against Venezuela, labeling them as blatant acts of hegemony and resource imperialism, revealing the true motives behind U.S. interventions in sovereign nations [2][3]. Group 1: U.S. Military Actions - On January 3, the U.S. military conducted a large-scale attack on Venezuela, capturing President Maduro and forcibly taking him to the U.S. [2] - President Trump announced that the U.S. would "manage" Venezuela and that American oil companies would invest billions of dollars to "repair" the oil infrastructure [2]. Group 2: International Reactions - The international community is increasingly outraged by the U.S. actions, with UN Secretary-General Guterres stating that it sets a "dangerous precedent" [3]. - Brazilian President Lula condemned the actions as prioritizing power over multilateralism, while Cuban President Díaz-Canel described it as state terrorism against nations in the Americas [3]. Group 3: Criticism from Within the U.S. - U.S. Senator Ruben Gallego criticized the country for becoming a "bully" on the world stage, and Senator Mike Lee questioned the constitutional basis for the actions [3]. - Former National Security Advisor Benjamin Rhodes described the intervention as a ridiculous attempt at regime change in Latin America [3]. Group 4: Broader Implications - The article warns that such actions threaten global peace and security, with even U.S. allies like the EU calling for respect for international law and the principles of the UN Charter [4]. - Chilean President Boric expressed the widespread concern that if "jungle law" replaces international norms, no sovereign nation is safe [4].