“不是...而是...”刷屏的一年，我读内容的快乐被AI偷走了。

Core Viewpoint - The article discusses the growing disdain for formulaic writing, particularly the "not A, but B" structure, which has become associated with AI-generated content and is perceived as lacking authenticity and depth [4][17][37]. Group 1: AI and Content Generation - The rise of AI-generated content has led to a proliferation of standardized writing styles, making it difficult for audiences to connect with the material on a personal level [20][25]. - Many people express frustration with content that appears to be generated by AI, as it often lacks the nuance and emotional connection that comes from human authorship [22][37]. - The article draws parallels between AI-generated content and pre-packaged food, suggesting that both are convenient but can feel disingenuous when presented as something more authentic [21][24]. Group 2: Writing Styles and Audience Reception - The "not A, but B" structure, once a useful rhetorical tool, has become a cliché due to its overuse, leading to a loss of its original impact [6][10]. - The article highlights that audiences are increasingly sensitive to the use of templates in writing, which can create a sense of disconnection and frustration [17][37]. - The historical context of rigid writing formats, such as the eight-legged essay, is used to illustrate how formulaic approaches can stifle creativity and genuine expression [11][14]. Group 3: Trust and Authenticity in Content - There is a growing distrust in online content, with surveys indicating that many people believe only a small percentage of what they read is accurate and created by real individuals [25][26]. - The article emphasizes the importance of authentic human connection in communication, suggesting that the current trend of industrialized content production undermines this connection [30][36]. - The author encourages readers to maintain their sensitivity to inauthentic content, as this awareness is crucial in an era dominated by AI and formulaic writing [39].