投入近千万元的门店被强制关闭，商场：拖欠提成租金，已构成根本性违约！多方回应

Core Viewpoint - The conflict between KKV and Shenzhen OneAvenue escalated as the shopping center terminated KKV's lease due to alleged long-term underperformance and non-payment of commission rent, leading to a second forced closure of the store [1][2][4]. Summary by Sections Store Closure Incident - Shenzhen OneAvenue officially reclaimed the KKV store on January 5, 2026, and initiated a new leasing process, resulting in KKV's second forced closure within a month [1][2]. - The shopping center claimed that KKV had consistently failed to meet agreed performance standards and had never paid the contractually stipulated commission rent, constituting a fundamental breach of contract [2][4]. Contractual Dispute - KKV's parent company, KK Group, stated that they had adhered to the contract for over four years without any objections from OneAvenue regarding unpaid commission rent [4][6]. - The contract stipulated a six-year term with a rent structure combining fixed and commission-based components, with the latter being contingent on sales performance [6][8]. Background of the Conflict - The conflict began in September 2025 when OneAvenue attempted to negotiate with KKV but failed to reach an agreement, leading to the termination of the lease on December 31, 2025 [4][5]. - KKV had invested significantly in the store, including nearly 10 million yuan for operations and collaborations, indicating a previously positive relationship [5]. Market Context and Performance - KKV has faced challenges in maintaining store performance, with reports indicating that it had closed over 10 stores nationwide in 2025, while still operating over 600 stores domestically and 700 globally [13][14]. - KK Group's expansion has been slower compared to competitors, with significant losses reported in recent years, raising questions about its market strategy and future growth potential [14][15]. Future Outlook - The ongoing dispute and KKV's performance will be critical as KK Group seeks to navigate its path towards a potential IPO, with past attempts having been unsuccessful [15]. - The resolution of this conflict may impact investor perceptions and the company's ability to capitalize on market opportunities moving forward [15].